The biggest general science conference in the world is shaping up to be unusually political this year, with an emphasis on global warming and sustainability. There's even a workshop on how scientists can fight anti-evolutionists on local school boards.
"It's a smorgasbord of all research in every field," said Ginger Pinholster, spokeswoman for the American Association for the Advancement of Science, or AAAS, which begins its annual meeting Thursday in San Francisco. "It helps to foster dialogue between scientists and the public and with policy makers."
Much of the research presented will look at the effects of global warming on glaciers, Antarctica and the ocean. In one speech, a Carnegie Mellon University professor who studies decision-making and public policy is expected to talk about how science can "induce urgent action" regarding climate change.
- Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.
- Public Discussion (2)
"It is the duty of every citizen according to his best capacities to give validity to his convictions in political affairs."
– Albert Einstein
Science an politics are two distinct fields but the notion that scientists and engineers should refrain from influencing policy or expressing opinion is very dangerous. I believe that when expertise and knowledge bear directly on a question of policy is one's duty to speak up for the betterment of all. It is unfortunate that in an attempt to be seen as non-partisan, scientists have essentially become non-political. Experts owe it to us to provide us with non-biased information and we owe it to them to listen when they express an opinion or recommendations on policy.
- 3 votes
Well put Jason.
The practiced application of reason and research is sadly lacking in the political fray. Too often facts are used in politics only to support an already-held belief, not to develop an opinion.
- 2 votes
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead. |



