Newsvine
  • Welcome
  • Help
  • Report Bug
  • Conversation Tracker
  • Your Column
  • Replies
  • Friends
Type Comments Since You Last CheckedArticle Source Last Checked Stop Tracking All Clear Tracking All
Advertise | AdChoices
Log In | Register
Close the Login Panel
Existing users log in below. New users please register for a free account.

New Users:

Existing Users:

E-Mail:
Password:
Forgot Password?
Please enter the e-mail address or domain name you registered with:
E-Mail/Domain:
Back to Login
Log Out
  • Top News
  • Local News
  • World
  • U.S.
  • Sports
  • Politics
  • Tech
  • Entertainment
  • Science
  • Business
  • Health
  • Odd News
  • More
    • Arts
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Fashion
    • History
    • Home & Garden
    • Not News
    • Religion
    • Travel
Visit Jason Coleman's column >>

JASON COLEMAN

Home Page
A structural engineer with a love for tech, politics, science, and culture.
Articles Posted: 8  Links Seeded: 1601
Member Since: 1/2006  Last Seen: 8/04/2011

What is Newsvine?

Updated continuously by citizens like you, Newsvine is an instant reflection of what the world is talking about at any given moment.

Get a Free Account
Help
Fun Stuff
  • Your Clippings
  • Leaderboard
  • E-Mail Alerts
  • Top of the Vine
  • Newsvine Live
  • Newsvine Archives
  • The Greenhouse
  • Recommended Articles
  • Wall of Vineness
Put a Seed Newsvine link on your own site

Gone Nuclear: How the World Lost Its Way

Seeded on Tue Oct 10, 2006 12:04 PM EDT
Read ArticleArticle Source: The Nation
politics, iraq, united-states, war, nuclear, north-korea, weapons, disarmament
Seeded by Jason Coleman
Advertise | AdChoices

As international leaders condemn North Korea's recent underground nuclear test, a crucial anniversary is observed: Twenty years ago Ronald Reagan and Mikhail Gorbachev outlined a vision for a non-nuclear world. What went wrong? In this Nation forum, Richard Falk, Mary Kaldor, Randall Caroline Forsberg and George Perkovich talk about how to put nonproliferation back on the global agenda.

…

The Reykjavik Summit in October 1986 will long be remembered because the leaders of the world's two superpowers, Mikhail Gorbachev and Ronald Reagan, seriously entertained for one brief moment the goal of a non-nuclear world. The end of the cold war reduced the fear of a nuclear exchange, but it did not bring us closer to a world free of nuclear weapons. Indeed, with the subsequent proliferation of nuclear weapons to India, Pakistan and North Korea, and with concerns growing about Iran's nuclear program, the idea of a non-nuclear world seems more distant than ever. As the report of the International Commission on Weapons of Mass Destruction issued earlier this year makes clear, even the limited goals of nuclear arms control and nonproliferation have been set back by the lack of leadership on the part of the United States and by the proliferation of new weapons states. And as worrying, the goal of nuclear disarmament no longer seems to animate the progressive community or the peace movement, let alone figure into today's discussion of American national security policy.

  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Published to:

  • Jason Coleman's Column, All of Newsvine
  • Groups: none
  • Regions: none
  • Public Discussion (3)
Oluseye

Seems like we have the same reading list. 7th article in a row I was about to seed only to find that you found it first. ;)

    Reply#1 - Wed Oct 11, 2006 4:52 PM EDT
    Jason Coleman

    Sorry to beat you to so many. I've enjoyed a lot of your articles (and particularly your writing) as well. To tell the truth, I'm just cleaning out some RSS feeds (the top of which end up here on Newsvine) before going out of town. Now I can just check your column here when I get back to get caught up.

      #1.1 - Wed Oct 11, 2006 4:54 PM EDT
      Reply
      woccam

      Nothing went wrong, in my humble opinion. Once physics got started (say, in Newton's time) nobody knew where it was going. Nobody could possibly know, and even today nobody knows what the future will bring.

      In physics, one discovery led to another and suddenly, in the middle of a war, we had the atom bomb. (Here's a short summary of the history of the bomb).

      I remember all that well, because I was a teenager in 1945 and the popular science and science fiction books had been stuffed with nuclear talk for years. We (me and my friends and teachers) all knew what was going on and when The Thing finally happened we shivered and chattered for days and weeks.

      Almost immediately, in 1945, the U.S. government permitted the publication of the Smyth Report, which gave an excellent account of the physics and theory of the bomb. It was obvious right then that the report was so detailed that sooner or later competent scientists and engineers everywhere would be able to replicate the Allied effort. We didn't know then that the Soviets already knew all about it.

      So non-proliferation died even before 1945. The spread of nuclear technology for good and evil was beyond anyone's control. As Stewart Brand says, "information wants to be free." I'm not sure what that means, but the North Korean bomb (if any) seems to illustrate it.

      By the time of Reykjavik the diffusion of nuclear knowledge was inevitable and no imaginable treaty could stop it. Nothing went wrong. Nature simply took its course, and there's no going back.

      Mutatis mutandis, the same dangers await us in every area of technical innovation. The only step we can take, it seems to me, is to encourage even more freedom of information than we have ever had. I suggest we abolish all barriers of secrecy, both commercial and governmental. Information technology appears to be setting us on this path in any case.

      This strategy may seem like madness, but the trend is happening anyway. Spy technology of all kinds is burgeoning everywhere, with eager encouragement by governments. This means, of course, that personal privacy will become obsolete. But let's admit it: privacy is already obsolete. Data mining is stripping us all naked. When we all know that we all know this, then perhaps we can start to excise social pathologies before they overwhelm us.

      • 1 vote
      Reply#2 - Wed Oct 11, 2006 11:04 PM EDT
      Leave a Comment:
      You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
      You're in XHTML Mode. If you prefer, you can use Easy Mode instead.
      (XHTML tags allowed - a,b,blockquote,br,code,dd,dl,dt,del,em,h2,h3,h4,i,ins,li,ol,p,pre,q,strong,ul)
      Newsvine Privacy Statement
      As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
      FUN STUFF:
      • Leaderboard |
      • E-Mail Alerts |
      • Top of the Vine |
      • Newsvine Live |
      • Newsvine Archives |
      • The Greenhouse |
      COMPANY STUFF:
      • Code of Honor |
      • Company Info |
      • Contact Us |
      • Jobs |
      • User Agreement |
      • Privacy Policy |
      • About our ads
      LEGAL STUFF:
      • © 2005-2012 Newsvine, Inc. |
      • Newsvine® is a registered trademark of Newsvine, Inc. |
      • Newsvine is a property of msnbc.com