Newsvine
  • Welcome
  • Help
  • Report Bug
  • Conversation Tracker
  • Your Column
  • Replies
  • Friends
Type Comments Since You Last CheckedArticle Source Last Checked Stop Tracking All Clear Tracking All
advertisement
Log In | Register
Close the Login Panel
Existing users log in below. New users please register for a free account.

New Users:

Existing Users:

E-Mail:
Password:
Forgot Password?
Please enter the e-mail address or domain name you registered with:
E-Mail/Domain:
Back to Login
Log Out
  • Top News
  • Local News
  • World
  • U.S.
  • Sports
  • Politics
  • Tech
  • Entertainment
  • Science
  • Business
  • Health
  • Odd News
  • More
    • Arts
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Fashion
    • History
    • Home & Garden
    • Not News
    • Religion
    • Travel
Visit Jason Coleman's column >>

JASON COLEMAN

Home Page
A structural engineer with a love for tech, politics, science, and culture.
Articles Posted: 8  Links Seeded: 1601
Member Since: 1/2006  Last Seen: 8/04/2011

What is Newsvine?

Updated continuously by citizens like you, Newsvine is an instant reflection of what the world is talking about at any given moment.

Get a Free Account
Help
Fun Stuff
  • Your Clippings
  • Leaderboard
  • E-Mail Alerts
  • Top of the Vine
  • Newsvine Live
  • Newsvine Archives
  • The Greenhouse
  • Recommended Articles
  • Wall of Vineness
Put a Seed Newsvine link on your own site

Carbon offsets: Sins of Emission

Seeded on Fri Aug 11, 2006 11:22 AM EDT
Read ArticleArticle Source: The Economist
politics, climate-change, global-warming, greenvine, carbon, co2, emissions, offsets
Seeded by Jason Coleman
advertisement

The idea of offsetting carbon emissions is sound in theory, if not yet in practice.

The sale of indulgences by the Catholic church in the early 16th century, whereby people could, in effect, purchase forgiveness of past sins by handing over enough money, was condemned by Martin Luther and other reformers. Today, some environmentalists are denouncing the "offsetting" of carbon emissions in similar terms. A company that wants to declare itself "carbon neutral" calculates how many tonnes of carbon it emits, and then offsets the emissions by paying someone else not to emit that amount of carbon on its behalf. Just as Luther criticised indulgences, critics of offsetting argue that the ability to buy retrospective forgiveness for sins of emission is no substitute for not sinning in the first place.

  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Published to:

  • Jason Coleman's Column, All of Newsvine
  • Groups: none
  • Regions: none
  • Public Discussion (4)
Jason Coleman

I personally have purchased carbon offsets this year for my vehicle. As the market for these offsets solidifies, my wife and I plan to integrate this into our annual budget (it's not as much as you might think). O Of course, we want to be sure that our money is going to someone who is both reputable and capable of actually reducing carbon emissions.

This is the beginning of what I feel will be the most practical solution to global warming: an open market for emissions trading. This is, of course, not a new idea. Emissions trading markets have been established in this country for quite some time (with the SO2 market being possibly the most successful and widely known). They provide a number of benefits, including economic incentives for reductions, a place for environmentalists to put their money into action, and allows individuals and companies to decide how to best meet their own demands. Of course, caps are generally set by a political process and enforcement is critical. However, there are proven methods for doing this already (under the Clean Air Act, for example).

This is partially what the Kyoto protocol hoped to do, but of course it had some significant (although hardly insurmountable) flaws. Developing nations obviously need to be addressed somehow. However, I feel the technological innovation going on here in the states is what would be to our advantage. If we develop the systems by which the reduction of emissions is best done, then we are in a better position to profit both economically and politically with regards to other nations.

    Reply#1 - Fri Aug 11, 2006 11:38 AM EDT
    Brian White

    The problems i've heard about with these trading markets is that the companies involved reported much higher CO2 limits than they actually produced when asked how much they put out, so that it would be easy to get under the line they'd set.

    • 1 vote
    Reply#2 - Fri Aug 11, 2006 12:07 PM EDT
    Jason Coleman

    There have been a number of problems in Europe with measuring, reporting, and enforcing Kyoto limits. However, we've had quite a bit of success in the states with a number of markets. I think that Kyoto tried to hard to reinvent processes that were fairly well established here for the global market. Obviously, there are concerns with different developing nations, but I'm not really sure why France and the UK couldn't do a much better job than they currently are. Of course, Kyoto hasn't really been in place that long, so there are bound to be implementation issues initially for such a large agreement.

      #2.1 - Fri Aug 11, 2006 12:19 PM EDT
      Reply
      Gideon Polya

      In Australia the States and Territories are controlled by the Labor Party (Al Gore-type democrat equivalents) , and the Federal Government by the Bush-ite Conservatives (who refuse to sign Kyoto). Accordingly the States and Territories (less 2 States earning big money from huge carbon dioxide-producing coal/natural gas exports) have just put forward a detailed, expertly-advised proposal for emissions trading (by way of circumventing the Federal Government intransigence). However the emissions trading proposal has been immediately vetoed today by the Federal Government ("it will put up the price of gas" etc). Australia, Canada and the US are the biggest per capita greenhouse gas producers in the world.

      • 1 vote
      Reply#3 - Wed Aug 16, 2006 6:34 AM EDT
      Leave a Comment:
      You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
      You're in XHTML Mode. If you prefer, you can use Easy Mode instead.
      (XHTML tags allowed - a,b,blockquote,br,code,dd,dl,dt,del,em,h2,h3,h4,i,ins,li,ol,p,pre,q,strong,ul)
      Newsvine Privacy Statement
      As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
      FUN STUFF:
      • Leaderboard |
      • E-Mail Alerts |
      • Top of the Vine |
      • Newsvine Live |
      • Newsvine Archives |
      • The Greenhouse |
      COMPANY STUFF:
      • Code of Honor |
      • Company Info |
      • Contact Us |
      • Jobs |
      • User Agreement |
      • Privacy Policy |
      • About our ads
      LEGAL STUFF:
      • © 2005-2012 Newsvine, Inc. |
      • Newsvine® is a registered trademark of Newsvine, Inc. |
      • Newsvine is a property of msnbc.com