Newsvine
  • Welcome
  • Help
  • Report Bug
  • Conversation Tracker
  • Your Column
  • Replies
  • Friends
Type Comments Since You Last CheckedArticle Source Last Checked Stop Tracking All Clear Tracking All
advertisement
Log In | Register
Close the Login Panel
Existing users log in below. New users please register for a free account.

New Users:

Existing Users:

E-Mail:
Password:
Forgot Password?
Please enter the e-mail address or domain name you registered with:
E-Mail/Domain:
Back to Login
Log Out
  • Top News
  • Local News
  • World
  • U.S.
  • Sports
  • Politics
  • Tech
  • Entertainment
  • Science
  • Business
  • Health
  • Odd News
  • More
    • Arts
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Fashion
    • History
    • Home & Garden
    • Not News
    • Religion
    • Travel
Visit Jason Coleman's column >>

JASON COLEMAN

Home Page
A structural engineer with a love for tech, politics, science, and culture.
Articles Posted: 8  Links Seeded: 1601
Member Since: 1/2006  Last Seen: 8/04/2011

What is Newsvine?

Updated continuously by citizens like you, Newsvine is an instant reflection of what the world is talking about at any given moment.

Get a Free Account
Help
Fun Stuff
  • Your Clippings
  • Leaderboard
  • E-Mail Alerts
  • Top of the Vine
  • Newsvine Live
  • Newsvine Archives
  • The Greenhouse
  • Recommended Articles
  • Wall of Vineness
Put a Seed Newsvine link on your own site

The Jury on Global Warming

Seeded on Thu Aug 3, 2006 9:46 AM EDT
Read ArticleArticle Source: seedmagazine.com
politics, climate-change, global-warming, supreme-court, scotus, climatology
Seeded by Jason Coleman
advertisement

A case scheduled to be argued in front of the nation's highest court could change the course of climate change policy.

The future of carbon dioxide regulation is up in the air, and it's not up to scientists or even industry to determine what lies ahead. Instead, that duty falls to experts in jurisprudence, not climatology.

Next summer, the Supreme Court will hear its first major global warming case: Massachusetts v. Environmental Protection Agency. The case, which asks whether the federal government should have to regulate carbon dioxide emissions, will bring the science of climate change from the lab bench to the judicial bench—giving nine justices the chance to reshape the dialogue on global warming.

  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Published to:

  • Jason Coleman's Column, All of Newsvine
  • Groups: none
  • Regions: none
  • Public Discussion (1)
Entelechy

I'm not sure why the author of this article thinks the Court is going to rule on the science of global warming. It seems that doing so is unecessary to demonstrate that Massachusets lacks standing. Obviously, regardless of whether failure to regulate CO2 actually harms Massachusets, the State can certainly enact its own regulations. Therefore, the State lacks standing. Even if the plaintiffs get past that hurdle, they still have to demonstrate that the Clean Air Act "implies" CO2 regulation despite not specifically saying anything about it. Massachusets will lose this case, regardless of the science.

  • 1 vote
Reply#1 - Thu Aug 3, 2006 12:30 PM EDT
Leave a Comment:
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
You're in XHTML Mode. If you prefer, you can use Easy Mode instead.
(XHTML tags allowed - a,b,blockquote,br,code,dd,dl,dt,del,em,h2,h3,h4,i,ins,li,ol,p,pre,q,strong,ul)
Newsvine Privacy Statement
As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
FUN STUFF:
  • Leaderboard |
  • E-Mail Alerts |
  • Top of the Vine |
  • Newsvine Live |
  • Newsvine Archives |
  • The Greenhouse |
COMPANY STUFF:
  • Code of Honor |
  • Company Info |
  • Contact Us |
  • Jobs |
  • User Agreement |
  • Privacy Policy |
  • About our ads
LEGAL STUFF:
  • © 2005-2012 Newsvine, Inc. |
  • Newsvine® is a registered trademark of Newsvine, Inc. |
  • Newsvine is a property of msnbc.com